A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to develop their relatives dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly developed, is in the right situation. Their legal group has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up meant to Get Visible evidence from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely noted that these actions were being cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged Rene Collier into a location impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been lined in detail through the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to know the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second inside the lawful timeline.
At the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as built, goes outside of what was approved and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been described as meticulous in his examination of arranging documents, maps, and conditions attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private view, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have described their prolonged-standing link to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple simply just endeavoring to build a loved ones house in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Area of Conservation and say that all operates have been performed based upon Expert suggestions and permitted plans. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into The ocean in the course of a storm, do not change the underlying details.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute more than development of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description for any condition that a lot of observers see as ever more popular. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become additional contentious.
The Irish Situations post about René Collier mentioned the businessman experienced previously been involved with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from quite different Specialist backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location with the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-large drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments and René Collier waded by waistline-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily truth in the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature in the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal approach.
Since the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket must figure out whether the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Place of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell together with each other extensive following the legal expenditures are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction is effective at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation extend past that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Additionally, it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental concerns such as environmental safety and house rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a spot of all-natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it will eventually be altered, taken out, or finished as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable continue on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most carefully watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.